Search found 201 matches
- Tue Feb 10, 2026 8:42 am
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: n_el in hfc2pms.m script
- Replies: 2
- Views: 83785
Re: n_el in hfc2pms.m script
I had a look, yes - we did put the number of electrons in for the exact reason that you describe: on our calculations (using Gaussian) we did always have a hard-to-explain integer multiplier that was needed for the data to match up. The integer was always equal to the nominal number of unpaired elec...
- Wed Feb 04, 2026 6:21 pm
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: Equilibrium density operator for spin 3/2 in two-site chemical exchange
- Replies: 2
- Views: 28110
Re: Equilibrium density operator for spin 3/2 in two-site chemical exchange
Alas, relaxation to thermodynamic equlibrium cannot be combined with equilibrating chemical kinetics. This is because relaxation theory treats equilibration as a coupling to the unit state and there is only one unit state and its population is by definition concentration-independent. Another way of ...
- Tue Dec 09, 2025 12:35 pm
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: ESEEM pulse sequence in the lab frame
- Replies: 2
- Views: 25986
Re: ESEEM pulse sequence in the lab frame
Hint: people will not do your project for you. :) 1. Yes; you do need to track the clock because phases in magnetic resonance are relative to the reference clock. 2. There is no way; Spinach uses a spherical tensor basis set. Express your projector in that basis set and then take the inner product. ...
- Thu Nov 13, 2025 11:34 am
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: Different matrix elements in two methods for the same operator
- Replies: 4
- Views: 36627
Re: Different matrix elements in two methods for the same operator
Ah, that's a long story. Operators and states in spin dynamics should never be normalised. Technical details are in Section 1.6.3.3 ("Normalisation-Commutation Dilemma") here: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-05607-9_1 Briefly, the SU(2) commutation relations like [Sx,Sy...
- Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:10 pm
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: Different matrix elements in two methods for the same operator
- Replies: 4
- Views: 36627
Re: Different matrix elements in two methods for the same operator
Not reproduced locally. The enclosed test across all formalisms runs correctly. Can you run the enclosed file on your end to see if works?
- Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:08 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: New user wanting to so ss NMR simullation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 150033
Re: New user wanting to so ss NMR simullation
Yes, see examples/dnp_*, examples/esr_*, examples/nmr_paramag, examples/giant_spin directories.
- Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:59 am
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: Return to Equilibrium Magnetisation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 66121
Re: Return to Equilibrium Magnetisation
Yep, loop is best for real-life modelling cases. I normally just implement the sequence literally: pulse by pulse, delay by delay, including any repetitions. Then it's a formally exact simulation that usually just works. There is a very recent function called steady.m - you could compute the sequenc...
- Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:07 am
- Forum: Spinach support
- Topic: Return to Equilibrium Magnetisation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 66121
Re: Return to Equilibrium Magnetisation
Thermal equilibrium in proton-carbon system is actually 1 + alpha*(Hz+0.25*Cz) where alpha is a small number (around 1e-5, quantum tech people like to pretend it does not exist) and the quarter appears because the magnetogyric ratio of carbon is around four times smaller than that of proton. To take...
- Tue May 06, 2025 2:43 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Spinach and SSNMR simulation.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 109051
Re: Spinach and SSNMR simulation.
By reading the manual and looking at the example set provided. 
- Mon Dec 23, 2024 12:02 pm
- Forum: DEERNet support
- Topic: Precision of the data generated with DeerNet
- Replies: 1
- Views: 154505
Re: Precision of the data generated with DeerNet
Of course there is - simply edit that line in the code and output as many as you wish! 