Difference between revisions of "Shaped pulse af.m"
(Sync syntax/arguments/outputs with current Spinach source) |
(Restore pre-bulk-edit wiki content) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{DISPLAYTITLE:shaped_pulse_af.m}} | + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:shaped_pulse_af.m}} |
| − | |||
Shaped pulse in amplitude-frequency coordinates using Fokker-Planck formalism (Eqn. 33 in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.07.005). | Shaped pulse in amplitude-frequency coordinates using Fokker-Planck formalism (Eqn. 33 in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.07.005). | ||
==Syntax== | ==Syntax== | ||
| − | + | rho=shaped_pulse_af(spin_system,L0,Lx,Ly,rho,rf_frq_list,... | |
| + | rf_amp_list,rf_dur_list,rf_phi,max_rank,method) | ||
==Arguments== | ==Arguments== | ||
| − | L0 - drift Liouvillian that continues | + | L0 - drift Liouvillian that continues |
running in the background | running in the background | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
==Outputs== | ==Outputs== | ||
| − | rho - final state vector | + | rho - final state vector |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | P - effective pulse propagator, only | |
| − | + | available for the 'expm' method | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | P - effective pulse propagator | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
| − | |||
An example of a chirped inversion pulse pulse applied to a system with 31 J-coupled protons (examples/nmr_liquids/shaped_pulse_3.m): | An example of a chirped inversion pulse pulse applied to a system with 31 J-coupled protons (examples/nmr_liquids/shaped_pulse_3.m): | ||
| Line 70: | Line 54: | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| − | |||
Of the three propagation methods, 'expv' is recommended because it runs Krylov propagation that avoids explicit matrix exponentiation. The 'expm' option forces the rather inefficient sparse matrix exponentiation path and should only be used when the effective propagator is required. In very anomalous cases (long pulses, large state vector stacks, very large state spaces), the 'evolution' option might become necessary. | Of the three propagation methods, 'expv' is recommended because it runs Krylov propagation that avoids explicit matrix exponentiation. The 'expm' option forces the rather inefficient sparse matrix exponentiation path and should only be used when the effective propagator is required. In very anomalous cases (long pulses, large state vector stacks, very large state spaces), the 'evolution' option might become necessary. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| − | |||
[[shaped_pulse_xy.m]], [[read_wave.m]], [[vg_pulse.m]], [[pulse_shape.m]], [[chirp_pulse.m]] | [[shaped_pulse_xy.m]], [[read_wave.m]], [[vg_pulse.m]], [[pulse_shape.m]], [[chirp_pulse.m]] | ||
Revision as of 15:50, 5 April 2026
Shaped pulse in amplitude-frequency coordinates using Fokker-Planck formalism (Eqn. 33 in http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.07.005).
Contents
Syntax
rho=shaped_pulse_af(spin_system,L0,Lx,Ly,rho,rf_frq_list,...
rf_amp_list,rf_dur_list,rf_phi,max_rank,method)
Arguments
L0 - drift Liouvillian that continues
running in the background
Lx - X projection of the RF operator
Ly - Y projection of the RF operator
rho - initial state vector or a stack
thereof
rf_frq_list - a vector of RF frequencies at each
time slice, Hz
rf_amp_list - a vector of RF amplitudes at each
time slice, rad/s
rf_dur_list - a vector of time slice durations,
in seconds
rf_phi - RF phase of the first pulse slice
max_rank - maximum rank of the Fokker-Planck
theory, increase until the answer
stops changing, 2 is a good start
method - propagation method, 'expv' for Krylov
propagation, 'expm' for exponential
propagation, 'evolution' for Spinach
evolution function
Outputs
rho - final state vector
P - effective pulse propagator, only
available for the 'expm' method
Examples
An example of a chirped inversion pulse pulse applied to a system with 31 J-coupled protons (examples/nmr_liquids/shaped_pulse_3.m):
Note that only 100 time slices are required in the frequency-amplitude representation: considerably fewer than would be needed in the Cartesian representation used by shaped_pulse_xy.m function.
Notes
Of the three propagation methods, 'expv' is recommended because it runs Krylov propagation that avoids explicit matrix exponentiation. The 'expm' option forces the rather inefficient sparse matrix exponentiation path and should only be used when the effective propagator is required. In very anomalous cases (long pulses, large state vector stacks, very large state spaces), the 'evolution' option might become necessary.
See also
shaped_pulse_xy.m, read_wave.m, vg_pulse.m, pulse_shape.m, chirp_pulse.m
Version 2.2, authors: Ilya Kuprov
